In the lumi reward benchmark, 58.1% of UK organisations operate a long service award scheme (n = 248, 2026 H1). A separate question, with its own base, asks which milestones are recognised: 10 years is the milestone chosen most often, by 67.8% of the organisations answering it (n = 87). The two questions cannot be read across one another.
Key findings
- The common annual recognition budget is £26–£50 per employee, chosen by 39.4% of organisations (n = 254). A further 5.5% have no dedicated recognition budget.
- The common typical value of an individual recognition award is £51–£100, at 37.5% (n = 208). In all, 63.5% put the typical award above £50 (37.5% + 26.0%).
- 58.3% apply clear limits on how often one person can receive a recognition award (n = 206). No organisation reported informal limits (0.0%).
- Monetary is the common primary form of recognition award, at 32.0% (n = 266). Experiential/voucher (28.2%) and mixed (25.6%) are alternatives.
- 51.7% operate no peer-to-peer recognition (n = 269). Points- or platform-based peer schemes are rare, at 17.5%.
- 58.7% do not measure the impact of recognition on engagement or retention (n = 269).
- 58.1% operate a long service award scheme (n = 248). Of those answering on milestones, 67.8% recognise 10 years of service (n = 87).
About the data
This paper reports how UK employers answered lumi's questions on recognition and long service awards. The lumi reward benchmark covers 269 UK organisations across 14 sectors and five size bands. Data was collected in the 2026 H1 collection window. Each figure gives its base (n): the number of organisations that answered that question. Percentages are rounded to one decimal place, so a distribution can add up to 100.1%. Figures here are national. Sector and size comparisons are available to lumi members. See how lumi works for the method.
The legal context
Recognition schemes and long service awards are not set by statute: whether to offer them, and at what value, is a matter of employer policy.
How much do UK employers spend on recognition awards?
Three questions describe the money behind recognition: the budget per head, the value of a single award, and any cap on how often one person can be recognised.
Budget per employee
The benchmark asked: What is the approximate annual recognition budget per employee? (n = 254)
| Answer | % of base | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|
| £26–£50 | 39.4% | common |
| £51–£100 | 24.4% | alternative |
| Up to £25 | 21.3% | alternative |
| More than £100 | 9.4% | rare |
| No dedicated recognition budget | 5.5% | rare |
£26–£50 per employee is the common answer. The bands either side of it, £51–£100 and up to £25, are both alternatives. Taking the two lower bands together, 60.7% budget £50 or less per employee a year (21.3% + 39.4%). 33.8% budget more than £50 (24.4% + 9.4%). A budget above £100 per head is rare, at 9.4%.
Having no dedicated recognition budget is also rare, at 5.5%. The question does not record whether these organisations fund recognition from other budgets or recognise staff without spend. For anyone designing a scheme, the per-head budget is the outer limit. Award values, frequency and reach all sit inside it.
Value of a single award
The benchmark asked: What is the typical value of an individual recognition award? (n = 208)
| Answer | % of base | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|
| £51–£100 | 37.5% | common |
| More than £100 | 26.0% | alternative |
| £26–£50 | 19.7% | rare |
| Up to £25 | 11.1% | rare |
| Non-financial only | 5.8% | rare |
£51–£100 is the common typical award value. More than £100 is an alternative, at 26.0%. Together, 63.5% put the typical individual award above £50 (37.5% + 26.0%). Awards of £50 or less account for 30.8% (19.7% + 11.1%), and each of those two bands is rare on its own. A further 5.8% give non-financial awards only.
The distribution sits towards awards worth more than £50. A scheme built on fewer, larger awards marks notable contribution. One built on frequent small awards makes thanks part of everyday working life.
The budget and award value questions measure different things and have different bases (254 and 208). One is spend per employee across a year. The other is the value of a single award, which may go to some employees and not others. They are not one distribution.
Limits on frequency
The benchmark asked: Are there limits on how frequently an individual can receive recognition awards? (n = 206)
The common answer is "Yes – clear limits apply", at 58.3%. "No limits" is the alternative, at 41.7%. "Informal limits apply" is rare: no organisation chose it (0.0%).
The answers fall into two clear positions. A formal limit spreads recognition across more people and makes cost easier to predict, but a consistently strong performer can reach the cap. Without a limit, the same person can be recognised for sustained contribution, but spend can concentrate on a few people, and control rests on the budget and on whoever approves awards.
What form do recognition awards take?
Form of award
The benchmark asked: Are recognition awards primarily monetary, experiential/voucher, or points-based? (n = 266, "Not applicable" excluded from the base)
| Answer | % of base | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|
| Monetary | 32.0% | common |
| Experiential/voucher | 28.2% | alternative |
| Mixed | 25.6% | alternative |
| Points-based | 14.3% | rare |
Monetary is the common answer, at 32.0%. Experiential/voucher, at 28.2%, and mixed, at 25.6%, are both alternatives. Put another way, 68.1% gave an answer other than monetary (28.2% + 25.6% + 14.3%). Points-based awards are rare, at 14.3%.
Each form carries a trade-off. Monetary awards are simple and flexible for the recipient, but sit close to pay. Experiential and voucher awards separate recognition from salary, with more administration and less choice. Points-based systems let the recipient choose when and how to redeem, and depend on a platform. A mixed approach lets the form suit the occasion but is harder to explain as one scheme.
Peer-to-peer recognition
The benchmark asked: What peer-to-peer recognition do you operate? (n = 269)
The common answer is "No", at 51.7%. Informal peer recognition is an alternative, at 30.9%. Points/platform-based peer recognition is rare, at 17.5%. In all, 48.4% operate some form of peer-to-peer recognition (30.9% + 17.5%).
Peer recognition moves some of the act of thanking people away from managers. An informal approach costs little and depends on culture. A platform makes peer recognition visible and countable, which helps reporting, but adds cost and rules on how points are given and spent. With no peer scheme, recognition stays with managers or a central process. That is simpler to govern, but relies on managers seeing contribution that colleagues may see first.
Who holds the recognition budget, and do employers measure impact?
Manager recognition budgets
The benchmark asked: How is manager recognition spending budgeted? (n = 267)
The common answer is "No", at 45.3%. Read against the other two options, this indicates no set budget of either kind for manager recognition spending. A central budget only is an alternative, at 34.1%, and so is a devolved manager budget, at 20.6%. In all, 54.7% budget for manager recognition in some form (34.1% + 20.6%).
A central budget keeps control in one place and supports consistent award values across teams. A devolved budget lets managers recognise contribution quickly and in context. The cost is more variation between teams, and a need for guidance so that similar contributions receive similar awards. Without a budget, managers may depend on case-by-case approval or on non-financial means.
Measuring impact
The benchmark asked: Do you measure the impact of recognition on engagement or retention? (n = 269)
"No" is the common answer, at 58.7%. "Yes" is the alternative, at 41.3%.
Where impact is not measured, the case for recognition spend rests on judgement and on the value of thanking people for its own sake. Measuring it needs data linking awards to engagement results or leaving rates. Even then, recognition is one influence among many, and cause and effect are hard to separate.
How many UK employers offer long service awards?
Three questions cover long service awards. They have different bases and treat "Not applicable" differently, so their figures cannot be read across one another.
Whether a scheme exists
The benchmark asked: Do you operate a long service award scheme? (n = 248)
"Yes" is the common answer, at 58.1%. "No" is the alternative, at 41.9%.
A long service scheme recognises tenure rather than contribution. It can mark loyalty with a predictable, low-cost moment of thanks. The question does not record why the 41.9% answering "No" do not operate one.
Milestones recognised
The benchmark asked: Which length-of-service milestones are recognised through long service awards? (n = 87, "Not applicable" excluded from the base; 82 organisations answered "Not applicable")
This is a multi-select question, so the figures add up to more than 100%.
| Milestone | % of base |
|---|---|
| 10 years | 67.8% |
| 20 years | 48.3% |
| 5 years | 42.5% |
| 25 years or more | 42.5% |
| 15 years | 31.0% |
| Other milestones | 10.3% |
10 years is the milestone chosen most often, at 67.8%. 20 years is recognised by 48.3%. 5 years and 25 years or more are each recognised by 42.5%, and 15 years by 31.0%. 10.3% recognise other milestones.
The base, at 87, is the smallest in this paper. An early milestone such as 5 years reaches more people and marks retention earlier in a career. Later milestones such as 25 years or more reach fewer people and mark a long career. Recognising more milestones spreads the scheme's cost over more awards.
Form of long service award
The benchmark asked: How are long service awards typically provided? (n = 220, "Not applicable" included in the base)
| Answer | % of base | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|
| Non-financial recognition only | 47.7% | common |
| Not applicable | 45.9% | – |
| Don't know | 6.4% | – |
| Combination of financial and non-financial awards | 0.0% | rare |
| Financial award only | 0.0% | rare |
Non-financial recognition only is the common answer, at 47.7%. No organisation reported a financial award, alone or combined with non-financial recognition (0.0% each). "Not applicable" accounts for 45.9% and "Don't know" for 6.4%. Because "Not applicable" sits inside the base, the 47.7% is a share of all 220 organisations that answered, not of those with a scheme.
A non-financial long service award keeps tenure recognition apart from pay and bonus, limits cost and avoids linking length of service to cash.
What the data means for reward decisions
The figures describe choices. They do not show which is right, and a rare practice may suit a particular organisation well.
Scale and frequency. Budget per head, typical award value and any frequency limit work together. Within a fixed budget, a higher award value means fewer awards. Is the scheme for frequent thanks for everyday effort, or occasional recognition of exceptional contribution? Does the mix of budget, value and limits support that purpose?
Form of award. Monetary, experiential/voucher, mixed and points-based awards carry different costs and send different signals. What do employees value? How close to pay should recognition sit? What can the organisation run without undue administration?
Who recognises. Recognition can come from a central process, from managers with their own budget, or from peers. Central control gives consistency; devolved and peer recognition give speed and reach. Who is best placed to see contribution, and how much variation between teams is acceptable?
Evidence. Measuring impact on engagement or retention takes time and data, and results are hard to attribute. How much evidence is needed to justify recognition spend?
Tenure and contribution. A long service scheme recognises staying; other recognition rewards doing. What balance between the two does the organisation want to signal? Which milestones fit the length of service in its workforce? Should tenure be marked in cash or in kind?
Frequently asked questions
What percentage of UK employers offer a long service award scheme?
In the lumi reward benchmark, 58.1% of UK organisations operate a long service award scheme (n = 248, 2026 H1) and 41.9% do not. Long service awards are not set by statute, so offering one is a matter of employer policy.
Which length-of-service milestones do UK employers recognise?
In the lumi reward benchmark, 10 years is the milestone recognised most often, by 67.8% of organisations answering (n = 87, 2026 H1). 20 years follows at 48.3%, with 5 years and 25 years or more at 42.5% each and 15 years at 31.0%. More than one answer was allowed, so these add up to more than 100%.
Are UK long service awards usually cash or non-financial?
In the lumi reward benchmark, non-financial recognition only is the common way long service awards are provided, at 47.7% (n = 220, 2026 H1). No organisation reported a financial award, alone or combined with non-financial recognition (0.0% each). "Not applicable" sits inside this base, at 45.9%.
How much do UK employers budget for recognition per employee?
In the lumi reward benchmark, the common annual recognition budget is £26–£50 per employee, chosen by 39.4% of organisations (n = 254, 2026 H1). In all, 60.7% budget £50 or less per head a year (21.3% + 39.4%), and 5.5% have no dedicated recognition budget.
What is the typical value of a recognition award in the UK?
In the lumi reward benchmark, the common typical value of an individual recognition award is £51–£100, at 37.5% of organisations (n = 208, 2026 H1). Taken together, 63.5% put the typical award above £50 (37.5% + 26.0%), while 5.8% give non-financial awards only.
Do UK employers give cash, vouchers or points as recognition awards?
In the lumi reward benchmark, monetary is the common primary form of recognition award, at 32.0% of organisations (n = 266, 2026 H1). In all, 68.1% use another form (28.2% + 25.6% + 14.3%): experiential/voucher 28.2%, mixed 25.6% and points-based 14.3%.
Do UK employers run peer-to-peer recognition schemes?
In the lumi reward benchmark, 51.7% of UK organisations operate no peer-to-peer recognition (n = 269, 2026 H1), so 48.4% operate some form (30.9% + 17.5%). Informal peer recognition, at 30.9%, is more widespread than points- or platform-based schemes, at 17.5%.
Notes
- Base, "Not applicable" handling and rounding are as described in "About the data". Bases differ between questions.
- Two questions exclude "Not applicable" from the base: the question on whether recognition awards are primarily monetary, experiential/voucher or points-based (3 organisations answered "Not applicable"), and the question on which length-of-service milestones are recognised (82 organisations answered "Not applicable").
- The question on how long service awards are typically provided includes "Not applicable" and "Don't know" inside the base. Prevalence words are not applied to those two answers.
- The milestones question is multi-select. Its percentages can add up to more than 100%, and prevalence words are not applied.
- Combined figures are sums of listed percentages within one question, with the parts shown each time.
Data appendix
Every question on this page, with its base and full distribution, as a spreadsheet: download the CSV.
All national figures used in this paper, as recorded in the lumi reward benchmark (collection window 2026 H1).
What is the approximate annual recognition budget per employee?
Base: 254 organisations
| Answer | % of base | Organisations | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| £26–£50 | 39.4% | 100 | common |
| £51–£100 | 24.4% | 62 | alternative |
| Up to £25 | 21.3% | 54 | alternative |
| More than £100 | 9.4% | 24 | rare |
| No dedicated recognition budget | 5.5% | 14 | rare |
What is the typical value of an individual recognition award?
Base: 208 organisations
| Answer | % of base | Organisations | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| £51–£100 | 37.5% | 78 | common |
| More than £100 | 26.0% | 54 | alternative |
| £26–£50 | 19.7% | 41 | rare |
| Up to £25 | 11.1% | 23 | rare |
| Non-financial only | 5.8% | 12 | rare |
Are there limits on how frequently an individual can receive recognition awards?
Base: 206 organisations
| Answer | % of base | Organisations | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes – clear limits apply | 58.3% | 120 | common |
| No limits | 41.7% | 86 | alternative |
| Informal limits apply | 0.0% | 0 | rare |
Do you operate a long service award scheme?
Base: 248 organisations
| Answer | % of base | Organisations | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 58.1% | 144 | common |
| No | 41.9% | 104 | alternative |
Which length-of-service milestones are recognised through long service awards?
Base: 87 organisations · "Not applicable" excluded from base · more than one answer allowed
| Answer | % of base | Organisations |
|---|---|---|
| 10 years | 67.8% | 59 |
| 20 years | 48.3% | 42 |
| 5 years | 42.5% | 37 |
| 25 years or more | 42.5% | 37 |
| 15 years | 31.0% | 27 |
| Other milestones | 10.3% | 9 |
How are long service awards typically provided?
Base: 220 organisations
| Answer | % of base | Organisations | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-financial recognition only | 47.7% | 105 | common |
| Not applicable | 45.9% | 101 | |
| Don't know | 6.4% | 14 | |
| Combination of financial and non-financial awards | 0.0% | 0 | rare |
| Financial award only | 0.0% | 0 | rare |
What peer-to-peer recognition do you operate?
Base: 269 organisations
| Answer | % of base | Organisations | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | 51.7% | 139 | common |
| Informal peer recognition | 30.9% | 83 | alternative |
| Points/platform-based | 17.5% | 47 | rare |
Are recognition awards primarily monetary, experiential/voucher, or points-based?
Base: 266 organisations · "Not applicable" excluded from base
| Answer | % of base | Organisations | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monetary | 32.0% | 85 | common |
| Experiential/voucher | 28.2% | 75 | alternative |
| Mixed | 25.6% | 68 | alternative |
| Points-based | 14.3% | 38 | rare |
How is manager recognition spending budgeted?
Base: 267 organisations
| Answer | % of base | Organisations | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | 45.3% | 121 | common |
| Central budget only | 34.1% | 91 | alternative |
| Devolved manager budget | 20.6% | 55 | alternative |
Do you measure the impact of recognition on engagement or retention?
Base: 269 organisations
| Answer | % of base | Organisations | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | 58.7% | 158 | common |
| Yes | 41.3% | 111 | alternative |
See how your organisation compares with other UK employers. Book a call
David Whitfield, Recognition and long service awards: UK benchmark 2026. lumi, collection window 2026 H1. https://lumihr.co.uk/research/recognition-long-service-2026Last reviewed 20 September 2026 · Figures describe organisations in the lumi reward benchmark, not a random sample of UK employers. Every figure on this page states the question asked and the number of organisations that answered it.