UK reward metrics · Wellbeing

Is there a documented wellbeing strategy, and how often reviewed?

Source lumi HRBase 267 organisationsFieldwork 2026 H1

43.8%No strategy

43.8% of organisations in the lumi HR community answered “No strategy” on wellbeing strategy and review cadence (base: 267 UK organisations, 2026 H1).

Figures describe organisations in the lumi HR community, not a random sample of UK employers.

How UK organisations answered

No strategy 43.8% Ad hoc 25.8% Annual 23.6% >Annual 6.7%
Wellbeing strategy and review cadence (base: 267 organisations, 2026 H1). Percentages percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding.
Wellbeing strategy and review cadence: share of organisations by answer
AnswerShare of organisations
No strategycommon43.8%
Ad hocalternative25.8%
Annualalternative23.6%
>Annualrare6.7%

Common, alternative and rare describe how each answer sits against the community: the most chosen answer is common; an answer chosen by fewer than one in five organisations is rare.

Definition

Captures whether a written wellbeing strategy exists and, if so, its review cadence, from ad hoc to more than annually. See the methodology for how the base is built, how not-applicable answers are handled, the public floor, and which organisations are excluded.

Cite this figure
Source: lumi HR, UK Reward Metrics, September 2026, lumihr.co.uk/metrics/wellbeing-strategy-and-review-cadence
Last updated 19 September 2026 · Data licence: CC BY 4.0 for the figures in the CSV download.

See how your organisation compares

Members see their own organisation against the peer group, by sector and size, on every metric.

Book a call