UK reward metrics · Benefits & Lifestyle

Are employee benefits reviewed regularly to assess relevance and value?

Source lumi HRBase 220 organisationsFieldwork 2026 H1

75.9%No

75.9% of organisations in the lumi HR community answered “No” on employee benefits reviewed regularly to assess relevance (base: 220 UK organisations, 2026 H1).

Figures describe organisations in the lumi HR community, not a random sample of UK employers.

How UK organisations answered

Yes – at least annually 22.3% Yes – occasionally 1.8% No 75.9%
Employee benefits reviewed regularly to assess relevance (base: 220 organisations, 2026 H1). Percentages percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding.
Employee benefits reviewed regularly to assess relevance: share of organisations by answer
AnswerShare of organisations
Yes – at least annuallyalternative22.3%
Yes – occasionallyrare1.8%
Nocommon75.9%

Common, alternative and rare describe how each answer sits against the community: the most chosen answer is common; an answer chosen by fewer than one in five organisations is rare.

Definition

How regularly the benefits package is reviewed to check it stays relevant and good value. See the methodology for how the base is built, how not-applicable answers are handled, the public floor, and which organisations are excluded.

For context, CIPD Reward Survey: Focus on Employee Benefits reports 26% (base: all-UK).

Cite this figure
Source: lumi HR, UK Reward Metrics, September 2026, lumihr.co.uk/metrics/employee-benefits-reviewed-regularly-to-assess-relevance
Last updated 19 September 2026 · Data licence: CC BY 4.0 for the figures in the CSV download.

See how your organisation compares

Members see their own organisation against the peer group, by sector and size, on every metric.

Book a call